“Pussy Riot” and the crocodile tears of liberal fundamentalists

Yesterday, a Russian judge sentenced the members of Pussy Riot, a Russian feminist punk rock group to two years behind bars for hooliganism and inciting religious hatred. The verdict was pleasing to many Russians who felt that the group had committed a highly offensive act by breaking into Moscow’s Christ the Savior Cathedral in February, and performing an arguably “blasphemous” song in that location.

Already, so-called “human rights” groups are condemning this decision.  Their responses range from accusing the Russian government of being too harsh in their ruling, to demanding an immediate release of the band members, to an outright condemnation of the Russian government and the Russian Orthodox Church.

From one perspective, there is certainly an element of political correctness. The condemnation of the Russian court’s decision is symbolic of a social dichotomy. With rampant feminism being a defining feature of the post-Christian West, most obviously, it contrasts feminism against “the evil patriarchy,” but it also hints at the conflict between secularism and religion. In other words, since Pussy Riot undoubtedly are representative of everything modern, what is being shown is being used to submit evidence to the general public regarding the supposed inherent “oppressiveness” of traditional values.

But more than this, it is also a battle between globalism and identitarianism, and the ever leftward-moving “far West” agains the ex-communist Russian state. For the opportunists in the offices of ostensibly “non”-government organizations of the West, the arrest and jailing of the group is a chance to further the agenda of left-liberal globalism. We need only look to the number of groups around the world, funded by the NED, to realize this is another instance of America’s imperialistic cultural and political wars.

Just like the scripted outrage that American liberals showed over Chick-Fil-A owner Dan Cathy’s announcement that he personally supported the Biblical definition of marriage, this served as another opportunity for the Western media outlets to acquire a feeling of self-righteousness and arrogance. Liberals on both sides of the Atlantic now clamour for the immediate release of Pussy Riot, supported by globalist terror brigades like Amnesty International.

Their hypocrisy can be seen in the fact that, when similar incidents happened in the West, they remained silent, and, contrary to defending the ideas of free speech and freedom of expression, or feigning indignation, they have actively supported such laws. When such incidents occur in the West against certain “sacred cows,” they have done the West has actively pursued not only people harassing others and creating public disturbances, but also those distributing material to like-minded people whose beliefs are simply perceived as “socially harmful.”

As Amnesty International’s cold shoulder to Ernst Zundel shows, some speech is more free than other speech.

For instance, two Britons were jailed for two and four years (link: , respectively, for merely possessing what a judge considered “racist” material. In Europe, people are routinely jailed in excess of two years, not for breaking into churches and behaving like hooligans, but merely for questioning the Allied narrative of history in their own homes. A notable case is that of Horst Mahler, who received six years in prison for what the German government termed “anti-semitic hate speech”. As another example, a Dutch mayor once proposed using “unorthodox methods” to combat racism and homophobia; among the offences which could have been punished were “dirty looks”.

Even the staunchest defenders of “freedom of expression” cannot truly ignore the hypocritical behavior of many “non”-government organizations.  For instance Amnesty International’s US website proclaims that band “allegedly perform[ed] a protest song in a cathedral,” and that since this constitutes a “peaceful expression of their beliefs,”  they are political prisoners.  The site further suggests readers to “send a balaclava to Putin” (for $20 each, of course).  Other propaganda pieces on the site call the arrest a “bitter blow to free speech”.  However, in 2003, Amnesty International openly refused to consider advocating the freedom of Ernst Zundel, stating that he was guilty of hate speech.  Instead, they recommended that the allegations of hate speech, “must be investigated, leading to charges,” if the court decided the said charges were serious enough.

Beyond political correctness, there is a more sinister element to this story.  In terms of propaganda, Russia is being dragged through the mud for not being supportive of sanctions against the nation of Iran, and for its relationship with Syria.  Since sending troops to Russian soil is nearly impossible in the 21st century, Russia must now be submitted to a cultural war.  This war is directed at the soul of the Russian people, namely the Russian Orthodox Church, and at the collective psyche of the Russian identity.

Russian blogger Anatoly Karlin acknowledges this, stating that the current Russian administration could be playing to the crowd.  For instance, he cites a poll from the Levada Center, inidicating that 47% of Russians thought that 7 years (not two) was an adequate punishment, and another from the Russia Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM; the Russian equivalent of the Pew Research Center or the Gallup Organization), stating that only 86% of Russians believed that prosecution was appropriate.

The fact that Russia has experienced a religious revival since the fall of the USSR must no doubt worry globalist elites.

In fact, many Russians believe that that the group is being used a tools for the globalist forces that are hostile to a resurgent Russian nationalism.  This is echoed by the fact that, “Putin’s Russia” is has come to embody everything that the globalists, including the supposed “conservatives” in America hate.  Russia, with its deferential attitude towards the Orthodox Church, its attitude towards sodomy, and its approval of the free-market, are all things which rile up the demagogues of the West. Furthermore, the ideology of  Putin’s United Russia party is based on conservatism and independence from outside forces.  The Party’s chairman, Boris Gryzlov has been quoted as saying, “We call our ideology Russian conservatism. We will not let the ideology of our country be formed overseas”.  All these things make Russia a prime target for globalist forces who are not only opposed to nationalism and self-determination in general, but also to any notion of a more conservative society in particular.

In conclusion, while many might consider two years in prison an excessive sentence, they should also remember that hooliganism, tresspassing, and hate speech regulations exist in many countries.  It was under these laws, not laws against defaming the government, that they were convicted, and the evidence was clear enough to convict them on these charges alone.  Moreover, people should not ignore the outstanding hypocrisy of various persons calling for the immediate release of the band, nor the political implications of the widespread condemnation of Russia that it has generated.

Instead, true traditional conservatives should stand by the Russian people as they supports the religious and cultural traditions of their country.

About William van Nostrand

William van Nostrand is a native of Chicago, Illinois and is currently the Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of RidingTheTiger.org. He holds a B.A. in Economics as well as a minor in cultural anthropology. His interests are highly varied and include late medieval European architecture, German romantic classical music, and travel.
  • Pingback: Pussy Riot: Is the West being hypocritical? - Religious Education Forum()

  • Bilqees Arrumiyya

    I’ve seen this referred to a “returning to the Dark ages.” Liberalism teaches that everything is up to be criticized and mocked and everyone has to be okay with that lest your beliefs are censored. At the same time, while the expressing of religious beliefs or really holding anything religious sacred is not illegal or proscribed (although some things are such as the concept of jihad or in many places discussion of khilafah), it has certainly become taboo and something that is dealt with in bullying fashion via the modernist weapons of mockery and ridicule. In the Chick-Fil-A fiasco it was calling the company intolerant and with Pussy Riot it’s calling Russia barbaric and backwards (for the wrong reasons as there are certain things worthy of such criticism). I see many modernists, liberals and leftists–whatever you want to call them–as nothing more than children. They seem stuck in the high school mentality, no thanks from the help provided by the existence of social media which encourages it and spreads it at lightning pace.

  • Ray Wilson

    This case is basically an example of western spin- the case is about a group of vulgar feminists blaspheming and disrupting service in a place of worship recieving punishment, but the west is turning it into a sort of ominous warning on creeping authoritarianism on the part of Putin. IT does not matter what they were saying, the fact is if a white power band decided to “protest” in a synogauge they would undoubtedly be getting absolutely no media sympathy if they were detained, and there would be plenty of voices clamoring for them to have the book thrown at them. The west seems to love making the most obnoxious and despicable types into martyrs and heroes for its causes, so “pussy riot” fits right in. I hope the Russians don’t bend on this.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Palmetto-Patriot/1248758243 Palmetto Patriot

    Excellent article. 

Archives