At a time when the United States of America conducts aggressive wars in many countries around the globe, and the American imperialists are being equally detested by all classes of workers, professionals, and intellectuals, it is important to understand which parties are the perpetrators of the imperalistic American policy, and how the problem must be addressed.
The beginnings of modern American imperialism as we know it today, arose at the end of World War Two, when the American imperialists and their allies occupied the German nation, subjected its people to starvation and hardship, and deprived them of human dignity for the reason that they would not abandon their German identity or their way of life. The insidious plans of the American imperialists were supported by immense finance-capital, as well as key members of the American government, such as Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau. In the second half of the 20th century, a similar pattern was repeated in Korea, as well as in the 21st century in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Kevin MacDonald, the acclaimed (and somewhat beleaguered) professor of psychology, has done excellent work on the origins of neo-conservatism, the current ideology which dominates American politics, so it will not be discussed in depth here. The fact remains though, that America is a state controlled by imperialist finance-capital, making it a “prison” of nations. What is also true is that because American society is a rootlessly cosmopolitan society with a degenerate culture, America is the enemy of all the peoples of the world, whether they are Christian or Moslem, White or Black, Western or Oriental; they are not liberators, but aggressive globalist imperialists whose aim is the destruction of all identities other than the one they wish to impose on others.
The majority of Americans today are still of European descent, even though demographics are quickly changing due to the situation on America’s southern border. Many of the European-Americans herald and praise the bombing and destruction of foreign nations in the so-called war on terror. People often criticize American imperialism as “white imperialism,” but it can just as easily be shown American imperialism is the imperialism of liberalism, which in itself entails diversity and multi-racialism, because what ultimately manifests itself as materialism is nearly intertwined with the racial dynamics of America. For example, though many Trotskyists and third-worldists would claim that American imperialism is “white imperialism,” many countries affected by American imperialism are white themselves. Furthermore — what about the Mexican who receives citizenship in exchange for serving in the imperialist army’s wars of aggression which benefit Israel, or those who invent a metaphysical “poverty draft” to pretend that those from among their own ethnic group or social class aren’t equally traitors for actively participating in imperialist wars? What about those who overwhelmingly helped elect Barack Obama, the Kenyan Zionist lackey, merely because of the color of his skin?
Though all segments of American society which profess support for the imperialist policies of their government need to equally distance themselves from the imperialist policy of their government, the largest burden does not lie on their shoulders. The biggest peddlers of imperialism today are the globalist elites who control the American mass media, banking system, universities, and entertainment, and who continue to justify their suppression of the popular masses and their invasions of foreign countries through mass media. It is this same imperialist clique which are the kingpins of degenerate American culture and the deplorable social situation which affects people of all races in the United States. These individuals are the true supporters of imperialism, and its staunchest advocates. I do not call them “American imperialists,” because in reality, America too is occupied by these same people who wish to use American blood and American resources as a springboard for their attacks on the rest of the world.
The lessons to learn here is that that America is a “prison of nations” which will only be dismantled by an active resistance to the the monstrous system of rootless cosmopolitanism. Furthermore, it is in the self-interest of peoples all over the world to actively support their brothers and sisters in foreign lands on the front lines against the American imperialists today, particularly as they undergo armed struggle. This includes those peoples living in the United States itself who are under occupation by the Washington-DC based regime. Those in the various regions of the United States themselves must take it on themselves to initiate the revolutionary spirit against the globalist agenda and its propaganda presented to them by the powerful elites, and re-establish the spirit of national independence.
“The beginnings of modern American imperialism as we know it today, arose at the end of World War Two, when the American imperialists and their allies occupied the German nation, subjected its people to starvation and hardship, and deprived them of human dignity for the reason that they would not abandon their German identity or their way of life.”
Excuse me,but you forgot to mention the fact that Nazi Germany killed approximately 6 million Jews during WWII (not to mention all the other causualties that arose from this war). Were these Jews not subjected to starvation, hardship, and deprived of their human dignity simply because of their ethnicity? The Jews were not even asked to abandon their Jewish identities or their way of life–they were simply exterminated. What were we supposed to do, slap their hands and ask them to please not do it again? Under the Marshall Act West Germany received approximately $1.45 billion dollars (that’s close to $14 billion by today’s standards)from the US to rebuild their country after the war. By 1952 as the funding from the Marshall act ended, the economy of every participant state had surpassed pre-war levels. While I am not insisting that this was all due to funding provided by America and the Marshall Act, it certainly was a factor.
I will be the first one to admit that America is not perfect, and there is certainly room for improvement, but this article is just another example of outright “America Bashing”.
First, the Jews were not deported merely because of their Jewishness. The fact is that, although people want to deny it today, the Jews constituted a real political threat to Germany – a far greater one, it should be stated, than the Japanese did to America. Many Japanese living in the United States considered themselves American, the majority of Jews did not consider themselves to be German. The Jewish Marxist leaders wanted to seize control of Germany sit on top as leaders forever, multiply in numbers, and put pressure on German nation with their importance.
Second, it is naive to think that it the Americans tried to re-build Germany out of a sense of duty to help the Germans. After all, it had been only a few years earlier that the Americans had mulled the idea of sterilizing the German people and breaking up the German territory. In any case, England and France received far more money than Germany, despite seeing less devastation, and the only reason Germany was permitted to rebuild was because geopolitically, rebuilding other nations would be difficult if Germany did not have some basic infrastructure. The fact is that ultimately, the goal of the Marshall Plan was to partition Europe between the Soviets and the so-called “Western world” and lay the ground for supranational blocs such as the EU.
Deported? Deported?! Oh, let me guess–you’re one of those who likes to deny that the holocaust ever happened, it was all just American propaganda.
As far as the Japanese internment camps in the U.S. go, they were a mistake made by a government thrust into a war they had no desire to join. At any rate those people were not starved, tortured, killed, or subjected to bizarre experiments by a government gone mad.
Adolph Hitler wanted to seize control of the world and sit on top as leader forever, multiply his “perfect” Aryan race in numbers, and put pressure on the world with his importance.
I really don’t care what the ultimate goal of the Marshall Plan was. The fact remains that many, many U.S. dollars went into rebuilding countries that were devastated by Hitler’s war. England and France got more money? Good for them.
Given the number of people who were said to have been in the camps, the experimentation was probably on a fairly low scale. Evidence? Like Irene Zisblatt’s tattoo that was magically removed by Mengele? How about some proof for all of those laughable horror/science-fiction stories about sewing people together, or the soap made from Jewish fat (now re-canted by even the United States Holocaust Museum)?
Hitler ambitiously wanted control of his country. So? Isn’t that the case with every man of power? “Put pressure on the world with his importance”? Please elaborate. If anything, Hitler did not want to conquer the world, only to get the “lebensraum” for the Germans, and to build a pan-European state but had almost no interest in anything beyond, except for maybe trade with other nations. The French, on the other hand maintained colonies in West Africa until decades after the war. Wouldn’t that be considered “putting pressure on the world with their importance”? And “forever”? Was Hitler immortal?
Yes, it went to rebuilding countries under US control. How is that fair? Europeans aren’t allowed to rule themselves? Was the United States entitled to control European affairs? And “Hitler’s war”? Yes, because that war was a one dimensional storybook tale of “good” and “evil.” Yup, keep listening to the global establishment; they clearly know best!
I did not “deny that the holocaust ever happened.” And while I acknowledge that it did happen, a large portion of the official story is based just as much on Soviet propaganda as American propaganda. You speak of Holocaust Denial’ and how loathsome those who bother to question history are. You probably have never seen David Cole’s documentary, nor read the tomes of literature which so-called ‘deniers’ have written (none of which actually “deny the Holocaust ever happened”).
If that’s not enough, then during the Zundel trial, the Raul Hilberg was forced to admit admitted under oath that there is no scientific evidence of genocidal gassings of anyone by the Germans. Furthermore, in every other case, people are willing to accept that “official history” may not be accurate, since history is written by the victors. But why is nobody allowed to put forth the idea that the official establishment history is bullocks, half truths and lies with a sprinkling of facts thrown in?
Moreover, you claimed that it was the American government who gave money to Germany to “help them out”. Now that I have said otherwise, you say the ultimate aim doesn’t matter. If you really believe this, then do you think it was right for the United States to provide Saddam Hussein with money in order to help them fight Iran?
It is erroneous to allude Money given to Saddam Hussein to that of postwar Germany, since Germany was rebuilt as you say for “infrastructure purposes” (not that i am disagreeing with this latest quotation) and Saddam Hussein was financed to fight an “enemy” at the time. Yes, later, he himself, became “the enemy”, but, along with the blowback from our finances to Afghanistan to fight the soviet threat being used to fund terrorism in the coming decades, we can say that it is not the same circumstances.
American politics changed on a geopolitical level after world war two because it was realized that America and the western world could not thrive if they remained un-allied, and uncommitted to mutual interests. However, it must also be said that these interests have been exploited and changed by the military industrial complex, neoconservativism and modern liberalism so that they have completely reversed course from the “mutually beneficial” to the uncontrolled.
Money given to fight proxy wars with communists and other enemies of America was probably done at first with good intention. given that the western world has been eager to avoid another world war, it is not entirely unbelievable that financing one country against an enemy is not a good tactic to help preserve one’s own nation.
Regardless though what HAS come about of this is imperialism, globalism, and rampant authoritarian democracy, but i doubt upon the idea that the ONLY reason America has ever given money to other nations is for control. I believe what was intended was initially new and good, but what developed has become corrupt and massively changed.